In Brazil, the name for Macaw is Arrara, because of their call.

Hillary Clinton has been a much better senator than Barack Obama. She has been a serious, substantive lawmaker who has worked effectively across party lines. Obama has some accomplishments under his belt, but many of his colleagues believe that he has not bothered to master the intricacies of legislation or the maze of Senate rules. He talks about independence, but he has never quite bucked liberal orthodoxy or party discipline.
If Clinton were running against Obama for Senate, it would be easy to choose between them.
But they are running for president, and the presidency requires a different set of qualities. Presidents are buffeted by sycophancy, criticism and betrayal. They must improvise amid a thousand fluid crises. They’re isolated and also exposed, puffed up on the outside and hollowed out within. With the presidency, character and self-knowledge matter more than even experience. There are reasons to think that, among Democrats, Obama is better prepared for this madness.
Many of the best presidents in U.S. history had their character forged before they entered politics and carried to it a degree of self-possession and tranquillity that was impervious to the Sturm und Drang of White House life.
Obama is an inner-directed man in a profession filled with insecure outer-directed ones. He was forged by the process of discovering his own identity from the scattered facts of his childhood, a process that is described in finely observed detail in “Dreams From My Father.” Once he completed that process, he has been astonishingly constant.
Like most of the rival campaigns, I’ve been poring over press clippings from Obama’s past, looking for inconsistencies and flip-flops. There are virtually none. The unity speech he gives on the stump today is essentially the same speech that he gave at the Democratic convention in 2004, and it’s the same sort of speech he gave to Illinois legislators and Harvard Law students in the decades before that. He has a core, and was able to maintain his equipoise, for example, even as his campaign stagnated through the summer and fall.
Moreover, he has a worldview that precedes political positions. Some Americans (Republican or Democrat) believe that the country’s future can only be shaped through a remorseless civil war between the children of light and the children of darkness. Though Tom DeLay couldn’t deliver much for Republicans and Nancy Pelosi, so far, hasn’t been able to deliver much for Democrats, these warriors believe that what’s needed is more partisanship, more toughness and eventual conquest for their side.
But Obama does not ratchet up hostilities; he restrains them. He does not lash out at perceived enemies, but is aloof from them. In the course of this struggle to discover who he is, Obama clearly learned from the strain of pessimistic optimism that stretches back from Martin Luther King Jr. to Abraham Lincoln. This is a worldview that detests anger as a motivating force, that distrusts easy dichotomies between the parties of good and evil, believing instead that the crucial dichotomy runs between the good and bad within each individual.
Obama did not respond to his fatherlessness or his racial predicament with anger and rage, but as questions for investigation, conversation and synthesis. He approaches politics the same way. In her outstanding New Yorker profile, Larissa MacFarquhar notes that Obama does not perceive politics as a series of battles but as a series of systemic problems to be addressed. He pursues liberal ends in gradualist, temperamentally conservative ways.
Obama also has powers of observation that may mitigate his own inexperience and the isolating pressures of the White House. In his famous essay, “Political Judgment,” Isaiah Berlin writes that wise leaders don’t think abstractly. They use powers of close observation to integrate the vast shifting amalgam of data that constitute their own particular situation — their own and no other.
Obama demonstrated those powers in “Dreams From My Father” and still reveals glimpses of the ability to step outside his own ego and look at reality in uninhibited and honest ways. He still retains the capacity, also rare in presidents, of being able to sympathize with and grasp the motivations of his rivals. Even in his political memoir, “The Audacity of Hope,” he astutely observes that candidates are driven less by the desire for victory than by the raw fear of loss and humiliation.
What Bill Clinton said on “The Charlie Rose Show” is right: picking Obama is a roll of the dice. Sometimes he seems more concerned with process than results. But for Democrats, there’s a roll of the dice either way. The presidency is a bacterium. It finds the open wounds in the people who hold it. It infects them, and the resulting scandals infect the presidency and the country. The person with the fewest wounds usually does best in the White House, and is best for the country.
I was addicted to Tetris in college. This was found by Maria, my college roommate who watched me waste many hours playing it.
If you live in the northern hemisphere October means autumn, if you're south of the Equator you're in early spring and if you reside in that special place called "medialand" it means the season of the list. At this very moment on editorial floors stretching from Taipei (my current location) to Melbourne across to Santiago and back up to Vienna, writers are busy compiling their year-end lists for December and January issues.
Not to be outdone, I've been working on a list of my own. But instead of making you buy this paper sometime between Christmas and New Year's, I'm going to save you the suspense and give you my ranking of the world's most and least hospitable places to conduct business meetings. The following criteria were gathered over the course of the past two months while on assignments in Asia, Europe and North America:
1. Venue. The meeting had to be held in the client's place of business.
2. Friendliness of reception staff. Points were deducted for offices that had laid off their receptionist in favor of a staff list stuck to the wall and a lonesome looking phone.
3. Security procedures. Points were deducted for silly measures like having your photo taken.
4. Waiting time from the moment the receiver was replaced to the time someone came out to greet guests.
5. Waiting time from being placed in holding room until the moment the host materialized.
6. Greetings. Points deducted for not having a business card. Further points deducted for avoiding eye contact, fishy handshakes and untucked shirts.
7. Coffee, tea or? Extra points for additional catering. Points deducted for not offering anything. Automatic failure for showing up with your own beverage but not offering anything to your guests.
8. Pacing of meeting. Automatic failure for starting the meeting with: "Just so you know, I'm a little pressed for time so I'm going to have to be out of here in less than 20."
9. Focus and engagement. Extra points for putting your mobile phone on silent and placing it face down and disqualification for taking a call in the middle of a presentation.
10. Farewells. Full marks for seeing a guest all the way to the exit and marks deducted for leaving them to get lost in a maze of partitions and desks.
Over the past few weeks I've visited the following countries: France, Switzerland, Germany, Italy, Britain, Denmark, Sweden, the United States, Japan, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Finland, Singapore, Spain, Belgium and now Taiwan. While you'd think there'd be a global corporate standard for receiving and hosting guests, the following reveals that a few countries need to enroll in finishing school. Here's how five of the 16 fared.
GERMANY German receptionists tend to be efficient and to the point. Hosts usually show up promptly and security is kept to a minimum, though some banks have started to behave like American companies with their security measures. Business cards are the norm rather than the exception and coffee, two types of water and apple juice tend to feature at the center of the table. In wealthier companies there might be chocolates too. Mobile devices are kept at a distance and ignored. The host will usually escort you to the lift and offer a firm handshake goodbye. Score: 9/10
SWEDEN Blame it on efficiency or cost cutting but many Swedish firms have resorted to the "call me on my mobile phone as you enter reception and I'll come down and get you" school of meeting and greeting. Sometimes a meeting that was supposed to be attended by three will only feature one person because one is off sick with a cold and another is home looking after a child with the flu. Meetings start on time and there's always fizzy Ramlösa on the table. Mobile devices are peered at occasionally. Meeting rooms are always well equipped with extension cords and full wireless and chairs tend to be ergonomic. The host will show you to reception and will often ensure your transport is sorted. Score: 6.5/10
UNITED STATES Receptionists increasingly seem to be off-brand and might be better suited to running their own nail bars than greeting visitors. Security measures are too heavy-handed - passports are required for crossing borders, not riding in elevators. It's become industry standard to make guests wait before sending an assistant out to fetch them and an all-too-common practice to make them sit while the host paces around the office on the phone. Guests are seldom offered drinks but the host(s) usually show up with towering coffee thermoses or water bottles that indicate they know something about a looming drought that you don't. Meetings are prefaced with odd sayings like "I'm going to have to jet in about five minutes but my colleagues will fill me in after" or "I'm glad you reached out today and came to see us." Blackberries will be consulted throughout the session and quite often the visitor will have to repeat main points several times. Guests leave meeting rooms parched and bewildered. Score: 4/10.
JAPAN Hosts are occasionally waiting in reception already and there's always a juggling act of dealing with shuffling umbrellas and bags while pulling out business cards. Meetings occur in rooms that are uniformly gray on gray on gray and tea (hot or cold) or coffee (hot or cold) will be brought in by a young girl teetering on Vuitton heels while balancing her tray of beverages. If there are four to six hosts, one will usually nod off during the presentation but this will be compensated for by colleagues who will make all kinds of grunts and gasps. You won't be quite sure when the meeting has ended, but eventually everyone will put hands on thighs, bow and visitors will be escorted to reception and hosts will bow till the visitor is out sight. Score: 7/10
ITALY Reception is often a man's job and the mood can range from personable to not particularly interested. Waiting times in Italy get longer the further south you go but are never as bad as you might expect. A good coffee is always a feature, more so than even water. Mobile phone calls will be taken and callers will be told off accordingly for ringing during a meeting, and visitors shouldn't count on meeting rooms featuring a broadband cable let alone Wi-Fi. Guests will be sent off with much animation and excitement. Score: 7/10.
If I were to draw up another list, it would be for business opportunities in 2008, and a global chain of workplace etiquette schools would top the ranking. My first campuses would be in New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles.